Template:Academic-written review/doc

Usage

This template is based off the Academic Peer Reviewed template and is meant for Wikipedia articles updated as part of a dual publication model used by journals to incentivize scholarly contributions to Wikipedia. Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the Wikipedia version to the community at large. <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext"> </syntaxhighlight>

Example with QID

<syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext"> </syntaxhighlight>

Produces:

Example without QID

<syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext"> </syntaxhighlight>

Produces:

Caveats

Note that this template transcludes the Cite Journal Template, and inherits one of the weaknesses/issues of said template. The author list must be formatted in a certain way or it will give errors when using the {{{vauthors}}} parameter. If you use this template and populate it with info pulled from Wikidata, it will not format the author list in a way compatible with {{{vauthors}}}. Rather than have each use of the template raise an error, this template uses the {{{authors}}} instead. Unfortunately, the use of this parameter is discouraged because it does not contribute to a citation's metadata, and users consuming cs1|2 citations via the metadata will find that the citation is missing authors.

Categories for pages using these templates

• Category:Wikipedia articles with corresponding academic peer reviewed articles
• Category:Wikipedia articles with corresponding articles published in {{{journal}}}

See also

• {{Academic peer reviewed}} - a similar template for articles, where content has been published in a peer reviewed journal
• {{External peer review}} - a similar template for articles reviewed externally but not full academic peer review